Brand equity is the commercial premium that a well-known, trusted brand commands over an equivalent unbranded product. Measuring it is difficult but essential for demonstrating marketing's long-term value.
Brand equity is the additional value that a brand name adds to a product or service beyond its functional attributes. It is the reason a customer chooses a familiar brand over an unknown alternative at the same price — or pays more for the familiar brand without hesitation.
Brand equity is one of the most commercially significant assets a business can build, yet it rarely appears on the balance sheet. It is intangible, difficult to measure, and easy to undervalue — which makes it a persistent challenge for marketing teams trying to justify long-term brand investment to finance-focused stakeholders.
At the Northern School of Marketing, we teach brand equity as a central concept in the RAMMS framework's Business Value phase. Understanding how to measure and communicate brand equity is essential for any marketer who wants to demonstrate the long-term commercial return on brand investment.
Strong brand equity delivers measurable commercial benefits across multiple dimensions:
Price premium. Customers pay more for brands they trust and recognise. Apple, for example, commands a significant price premium over technically comparable competitors because of the equity built through decades of consistent brand investment.
Reduced customer acquisition cost. Familiar brands require less persuasion. When customers already know and trust your brand, the cost of converting them is lower than for an unknown competitor.
Greater resilience in downturns. Strong brands retain customers during economic pressure. Customers cut spending on unfamiliar or low-equity brands before they cut spending on brands they trust.
Faster new product adoption. When an established brand launches a new product, it benefits from the trust and familiarity built by existing products. This reduces the time and cost required to build awareness and credibility.
Talent attraction. Strong employer brands attract better candidates at lower recruitment cost — a benefit that extends well beyond the marketing function.
The most widely used academic framework for understanding brand equity is Keller's Customer-Based Brand Equity (CBBE) model, which defines brand equity as the differential effect of brand knowledge on consumer response to marketing activity.
Keller identifies four components:
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Brand salience | How readily customers think of the brand in relevant situations |
| Brand performance | How well the product or service meets customer needs |
| Brand imagery | The associations customers form with the brand beyond functional attributes |
| Brand judgements and feelings | Customers' evaluations of and emotional responses to the brand |
Strong brand equity requires depth and breadth across all four components. A brand that is well-known but poorly regarded has high salience but weak equity. A brand that delivers excellent products but has low awareness has strong performance but limited equity.
Brand equity is measured through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. No single metric captures it fully; the most reliable approach combines several complementary measures.
Regular brand tracking surveys measure awareness, consideration, preference, and advocacy among your target audience. Key metrics include:
Tracking these metrics over time reveals whether brand equity is growing, stable, or declining.
Measure the price premium your brand commands over unbranded or lower-equity alternatives. This can be done through:
The relationship between share of voice (your brand's proportion of total category advertising spend) and share of market is a useful indicator of brand equity. Brands with higher share of market than share of voice are typically benefiting from accumulated brand equity. Brands with lower share of market than share of voice are either building equity or failing to convert awareness into purchase.
Several methodologies exist for placing a financial value on a brand:
Royalty relief method: Estimates the value of the brand by calculating the royalties a company would pay to license it from a third party. This is the most widely used method for financial reporting purposes.
Earnings split method: Identifies the proportion of a business's earnings attributable to the brand, then capitalises those earnings.
Brand contribution method: Used by Interbrand in its annual Best Global Brands report, this method calculates the proportion of revenue attributable to the brand and applies a multiplier based on brand strength.
Brand equity is built through consistent, sustained investment in brand-building activities. The key principles are:
Consistency. Brand equity accumulates through repeated, consistent exposure. Every interaction a customer has with your brand either builds or erodes equity. Inconsistent messaging, visual identity, or customer experience undermines the accumulation of equity.
Relevance. Brand equity is not static. A brand that was highly relevant to its audience a decade ago may have declining equity today if it has not evolved with changing customer needs and values. Regular brand tracking identifies relevance gaps before they become commercial problems.
Differentiation. Brand equity is built on meaningful differentiation. Brands that are indistinguishable from their competitors build weak equity regardless of how much they spend on advertising.
Long-term commitment. Brand equity is a long-term asset. The returns on brand investment are typically measured in years, not quarters. Businesses that cut brand investment during downturns often see the consequences in declining equity metrics two to three years later.
The challenge for marketing teams is translating brand equity metrics into language that resonates with finance directors and boards. The most effective approach is to connect brand equity measures to financial outcomes:
The RAMMS Business Value phase provides a structured framework for making these connections. By linking brand equity measures to commercial outcomes, marketing teams can demonstrate that brand investment is not a cost — it is a capital allocation decision with measurable returns.
For further reading, see our articles on what is marketing ROI and how do you measure it and customer lifetime value: the most important metric in marketing.
Updated Name
Founder, Northern School of Marketing
Danny Reed is the creator of the RAMMS Framework and founder of the Northern School of Marketing. He specialises in connecting marketing strategy to measurable financial outcomes.
Share of Voice and Market Share: The Relationship Every Marketer Must Understand
The relationship between share of voice and share of market is one of the most robust findings in marketing science. Brands that invest above their market share consistently grow; those that invest below it consistently decline.
Proving Marketing's Commercial Impact: From Activity to Profit
The gap between marketing activity and commercial proof is where most marketing teams lose credibility with boards and finance directors. Closing it requires a disciplined measurement approach, not more data.
The Business Case for Marketing: How to Present Marketing to the Board
Most marketing teams struggle to communicate their commercial value to boards and finance directors. The solution is not better marketing — it is better commercial storytelling.
Marketing ROI Attribution: Connecting Spend to Revenue
Attribution modelling is the discipline of assigning credit to the marketing touchpoints that drive conversions and revenue. Without it, marketing budgets are allocated on gut feel rather than evidence.
We use cookies to improve your experience, analyse site traffic, and show relevant content. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of analytics and marketing cookies. You can also or choose "Necessary Only" to decline non-essential cookies. Read our Cookie Policy for more information.